Image by Lindsey Wood
A few years ago, I did the maths and realized that I had ridden my bike the equivalent of all the way around the world at the equator. The realization was kind of sad…all that way and yet I had only gone back and forth from my home to the office.
In this guest post, Peter Rice suggests that if you take your bike to work, the next logical step is taking your bike on vacation.
Enter Peter Rice. [click to continue…]
It’s been about ten months since I last posted to this blog. I had run out of things to say and, frankly, I thought I was done; but this morning’s commute changed my mind. What was special about today’s commute? I’m working from home.
It’s hard to appreciate a view like this from a car moving at 40 mph in traffic. That’s one reason I ride a bike. Photo by Natesh Ramasamy.
My bedroom is upstairs and my desk is downstairs, but I felt compelled to put a 45 minute ride in between the two. What is really remarkable about this is that when I started commuting almost ten years ago getting on my bike was a daily struggle and I often was only able to do it because I had left myself no other option for getting to work.
I honestly don’t know whether my “ride to work” was a waste of time, but I do know that my reason for riding has changed from something I have to do to something I want to do. [click to continue…]
May 12-16 is Bike to Work Week and you will undoubtedly have many opportunities to read about the health and monetary benefits of riding a bike to work. Those articles will be informative and enjoyable and I encourage you to read them.
My Bike to Work Week post, however, will have no practical value.
I love the way clouds scrape the mountain in spring. This cloud, lit up by alpenglow, makes it hard to tell where the snow-capped mountain stops and the sky begins.
Springtime is ideal for riding a bike to work for so many reasons, but my favorite—by far—is the beauty of the ride. It’s something you can’t appreciate through your car’s tinted windows. It’s something you don’t dare appreciate at 65 miles and hour in bumper to bumper traffic. [click to continue…]
Recently our family took a road trip from Utah to points East. Along the way from Hershey, Pennsylvania to Washington, D.C. we took a detour to Lancaster County to see “Amish Country.” Rolling hills: check. Large families tending well-kept farms: check. Horse drawn buggies: check. Other people looking at Amish Country: check.
Interestingly, we (and many other people) drove thousands of miles at 75-80 mph to—purposely—get stuck behind a buggy.
This guy doesn’t know that the road is for cars. Photo by Tony Fischer.
No one goes to Amish Country and then complains about being delayed by slower traffic because it is expected, but take your bicycle into a traffic lane and don’t be surprised to hear a horn or two.
It’s time to reset expectations—those of motorists, and more importantly your own. While I generally ride on the shoulder (most streets in Salt Lake have a generous shoulder), there are good reasons for riding in the middle of a lane of traffic, and you should be aware of and become comfortable with them. Read why you should take the lane
Yesterday on a train, I was asked to take yet another survey on transportation and transit. I take every survey that comes my way because I have strong opinions on the subject, but for the last year and a half or so, I have been embarrassed about my answer to one of the questions: how many cars do you have?
Why you should include a bicycle in your transportation mix.
I hate admitting we have two cars and two licensed drivers because it implies that everyone in our household who can drive has a car. The truth is that one of the cars gets driven about once a month–primarily to keep the oil circulating and the wheels rotated. (The reason for this “spare” car is a future post.)
While cars have a reasonable (and important) place in the lives of most of us, I firmly believe that not only should a bicycle be in every person’s transportation mix, it should be the go-to vehicle. Why? [click to continue…]
I just saw another of those studies that answers a question us non-Ph.D types wouldn’t bother asking. In this case the question was, “Are higher speeds more dangerous?” The scientifically-validated answer: yes.
For some, the need for speed starts young. Photo by Rich Moffitt.
No one should be surprised that that higher vehicle speeds lead to more deaths as well as more crashes in general. But what may be surprising are the many non-crashy ways speed kills. [click to continue…]